Worship Wars

Contemporary or Traditional?  That is one of the hot button issues in many of today's churches.  Quite a few have attempted to bridge the gap by having "blended" worship services.  I preached the first part of a two-part message entitled, "Symbols & Cymbals of Worship" based on 2 Samuel 6.  At the risk of being misunderstood and misinterpreted, let me clarify a few things for you:

1. "Contemporary" is a subjective word.  What is contemporary to you might be considered outdated by another and vice-versa.

2. I am not against certain "secular" music.  I like certain songs from a variety of genres of music.  For instance, I have a George Strait greatest hist CD that I enjoy listening to from time to time.

3. What makes a song God-honoring or satanic is the lyrics, not necessarily the music.  Songs that promote alcohol, drugs, promiscuous sex, and other behaviors that are expressly forbidden in the Bible are satanic in origin and a believer has no businesses listening to them.

4. I am not against "praise bands" and "praise teams" in a worship service.  I actually enjoy them.  I think having a variety of things in a worship service adds excitement, energy, and creativity.  

5. I am not against traditional choirs.  In fact, I believe they add a great deal to the worship service.  You can do things with a choir that you cannot do with a praise band or praise team. 

6. I am against playing secular music in a worship service.  Why, you might ask?  The main reason is you cannot hope to achieve spiritual results (salvation of souls, conviction of sin, transformation of the heart) by using worldly methods.  Oil and water do not mix.

2 Cor. 6:14-18 (ESV):
 Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? ¹⁵ What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a believer share with an unbeliever? ¹⁶ What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; as God said,

“I will make my dwelling among them and walk among them,
    and I will be their God,
    and they shall be my people.
¹⁷ Therefore go out from their midst,
    and be separate from them, says the Lord,
and touch no unclean thing;
    then I will welcome you,
¹⁸ and I will be a father to you,
    and you shall be sons and daughters to me,
says the Lord Almighty.”

Although Paul is dealing with the marriage of a believer to an unbeliever, the broader scriptural application is clear:  believers should be different from the world.   That includes their talk, attitudes, behaviors, and choices.  God is not honored when we bring secular music into our worship experience.  In fact, we do people a disservice.  

So in closing, let me be clear:  I believe a church should use a variety of methods for worship including a traditional choir, praise band, and praise teams.  I believe the music should be uptempo, energetic, and cause people to lift their voices in praise.  However, no matter what method you use, the music should always exalt Christ, honor the Father, and enable the Holy Spirit to supernaturally work in the hearts and minds of the people.  What that is done, souls will be saved and lives changed for the glory of God.

Blessings,

Bryan

Was Jesus Really Married?

I first read the book, The DaVinci Code, back in 2003.  A friend I worked with let me borrow so I could see for myself what all the fuss was about.  I read it-and then promptly dismissed it.  There were so many holes and fabrications in Dan Brown's work that it was laughable.  That is, until the general public started believing it to be serious academic work instead of what it really was-entertainment fiction.  The sad thing about it was Brown started believing he was a serious scholar and attributing factual claims to his book that did not stand up.  Several years later came the movie starring Tom Hanks-I really liked him up to that point.  Just when I thought we had put all these unfounded claims to rest, here it rears back it's ugly head.

Karen King, a Harvard divinity professor, has been given a small fragment of a papyrus written in Coptic from around the 4th century.  It is presumed the fragment is Egyptian in origin, and is translated, "Jesus said to them, my wife.."  Dr. King is now saying this fragment is part of a larger papyrus scroll still yet to be found.  She has dubbed this fragment, "The Gospel of Jesus' Wife."  Well, I am just a simple country preacher.  I don't teach at Harvard.  However, I do have a little common sense.  At least that is what my wife tells me occasionally.  So, let us look at the facts of this "gospel."

• The fragment is the size of a business card.  
• The fragment is from the middle of a larger papyrus scroll-which means you lose the context in which it was written all together.
• The papyrus is dated to the 4th century.  That is more than 400 years after Jesus' death and resurrection.
• The texts we have in the Bible were written much earlier.  Epistles like 1 Corinthians were written around 55-56 A.D.-just a mere 22-25 years after Jesus' passion.  The last gospel written, John, was composed around 90 A.D.
• Karen King has an agenda.  Read this article:
•  http://www.examiner.com/article/karen-king-needs-jesus-to-have-a-wife-so-her-career-can-have-a-future.

The bottom line is:  if you are a Christian, the Bible you have is the most tried, tested, and authenticated source of Jesus' life on the planet.  Don't lose sleep over this.  Have confidence.  Just my take on this whole deal.

Blessings,
Bryan